We Built a 15-Agent System with Anthropic MCP: Here's When It Fails (and Shines) deepsense.ai 4 points by raczekk 12 hours ago
raczekk 12 hours ago We recently built a production-grade multi-agent system for document analysis using Anthropic’s Model Context Protocol (MCP). The system orchestrates 15+ agents with dynamic tool usage and task delegation.Here's the deep dive: https://deepsense.ai/blog/standardizing-ai-agent-integration...Key insights:1. When MCP works best:- Multiple agents sharing tools/resources- Dynamic tool orchestration needs- Rapid prototypes that must scale to production2. When MCP is overkill:- Simple static API integrations- Performance-critical apps needing sub-ms latency- When direct SDK calls are clearer3. Practical takeaways:- Design APIs for LLMs, not humans (strict typing = fewer errors)- Limit tool access per agent (reduced hallucinations + ~50% token savings)We also uncovered real security pitfalls in production and saw how model-task matching (e.g. Haiku vs Sonnet) affects performance and cost.What are your experiences?
We recently built a production-grade multi-agent system for document analysis using Anthropic’s Model Context Protocol (MCP). The system orchestrates 15+ agents with dynamic tool usage and task delegation.
Here's the deep dive: https://deepsense.ai/blog/standardizing-ai-agent-integration...
Key insights:
1. When MCP works best:
- Multiple agents sharing tools/resources
- Dynamic tool orchestration needs
- Rapid prototypes that must scale to production
2. When MCP is overkill:
- Simple static API integrations
- Performance-critical apps needing sub-ms latency
- When direct SDK calls are clearer
3. Practical takeaways:
- Design APIs for LLMs, not humans (strict typing = fewer errors)
- Limit tool access per agent (reduced hallucinations + ~50% token savings)
We also uncovered real security pitfalls in production and saw how model-task matching (e.g. Haiku vs Sonnet) affects performance and cost.
What are your experiences?