> Deborah Turness tried to justify the doctored video and mangled timeline of the day by citing the US Congressional Committee on Trump’s role in the January 6th riots – the one which concluded he was involved in a “multi-part conspiracy” to overturn the legal results of the 2020 election.
> Yet this was a Democrat-packed Committee, not an objective source of truth. I can see no justification for editing video clips so that a presidential candidate appears to say something he never did – and this defence did nothing to change my mind. I do urge the Board to pay particular attention to this matter.
Perhaps he could look into some of the subsequent criminal convictions or any of the other pillars of the effort?
Would have to see the video to determine if it was "doctored" or just a highlight reel. Don't really care to.
https://archive.is/F5K38
> Deborah Turness tried to justify the doctored video and mangled timeline of the day by citing the US Congressional Committee on Trump’s role in the January 6th riots – the one which concluded he was involved in a “multi-part conspiracy” to overturn the legal results of the 2020 election.
> Yet this was a Democrat-packed Committee, not an objective source of truth. I can see no justification for editing video clips so that a presidential candidate appears to say something he never did – and this defence did nothing to change my mind. I do urge the Board to pay particular attention to this matter.
Perhaps he could look into some of the subsequent criminal convictions or any of the other pillars of the effort?
Would have to see the video to determine if it was "doctored" or just a highlight reel. Don't really care to.